|
support for multi instance zephyr in same soc
Interesting, some parts of the documentation gave me the (wrong?) impression that a BOARD allowed some level of variation and configuration at build time: https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/guides/
Interesting, some parts of the documentation gave me the (wrong?) impression that a BOARD allowed some level of variation and configuration at build time: https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/guides/
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6720
·
|
|
Pinmux override
Looks like https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/devel/topic/61321118
Looks like https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/devel/topic/61321118
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6633
·
|
|
Mesh on off model not available.
https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/search.html?q=mesh+onoff From: <devel@...> on behalf of Brett Preston <bpreston@...> Date: Wednesday, 18 December 2019 at 13:2
https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/search.html?q=mesh+onoff From: <devel@...> on behalf of Brett Preston <bpreston@...> Date: Wednesday, 18 December 2019 at 13:2
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6596
·
|
|
about the difference of device tree use method compare with linux?
Run-time aspects aside, I (naively?) believe using a different language enforces a much cleaner and maintainable separation between generic code and hardware specific configuration. The Linux kernel h
Run-time aspects aside, I (naively?) believe using a different language enforces a much cleaner and maintainable separation between generic code and hardware specific configuration. The Linux kernel h
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6505
·
|
|
Delayed vs non-delayed Workqueues usage
I think it's the same object-oriented pattern than the Linux one described in more detail at: https://lwn.net/Articles/446317/
I think it's the same object-oriented pattern than the Linux one described in more detail at: https://lwn.net/Articles/446317/
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6496
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.14.1 tagged
Extremely useful workaround: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commits/v1.14-branch \-> https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/19639 \->https://builds.zephyrproject.org/zephyrpro
Extremely useful workaround: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commits/v1.14-branch \-> https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/19639 \->https://builds.zephyrproject.org/zephyrpro
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6368
·
|
|
Need help in establishing client-server socket communication between my Ubuntu PC and PCA10056 board, on which Zephyr is running.
#nrf52840
#samples
It should but might not be enough because ufw is just a user interface. Use "ip[6]tables -L" to verify the actual state.
It should but might not be enough because ufw is just a user interface. Use "ip[6]tables -L" to verify the actual state.
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6332
·
|
|
Do not use west v0.6.1; upgrade to v0.6.2
One of those jobs that everyone needs but no one wants to do? PS: versioning plus a bit more https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/guides/west/why.html
One of those jobs that everyone needs but no one wants to do? PS: versioning plus a bit more https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/guides/west/why.html
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6237
·
|
|
What branch should I be using for the 1.14 LTS release?
It's still not clear to me what you're looking for but maybe this git command will help: git log --decorate --no-walk --oneline $(git tag -l v1.14*) upstream/v1.14-branch 5ad3f4a6930d (tag: v1.14.1-rc
It's still not clear to me what you're looking for but maybe this git command will help: git log --decorate --no-walk --oneline $(git tag -l v1.14*) upstream/v1.14-branch 5ad3f4a6930d (tag: v1.14.1-rc
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6199
·
|
|
shipable ...
Shippable's "rich" UI affects not just accessibility but also any user trying to perform simple things like searching for some specific error message across all 5 shards or (let's go crazy) across dif
Shippable's "rich" UI affects not just accessibility but also any user trying to perform simple things like searching for some specific error message across all 5 shards or (let's go crazy) across dif
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6185
·
|
|
New sample for the microbit Line follower robot
#samples
#microbit
#robot
On Linux the script zephyrproject/tools/ci-tools/scripts/check_compliance.py -c commit_range checks all that for you. I also got the script running on Windows too once with a couple hacks. Marc From:
On Linux the script zephyrproject/tools/ci-tools/scripts/check_compliance.py -c commit_range checks all that for you. I also got the script running on Windows too once with a couple hacks. Marc From:
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #6072
·
|
|
Logging with a string via %s
There's a violation of the "Least Astonishment" principle but it's not with the '%s'. The '%s' traditionally refers to the type of the argument only, it says nothing about memory management. I don't t
There's a violation of the "Least Astonishment" principle but it's not with the '%s'. The '%s' traditionally refers to the type of the argument only, it says nothing about memory management. I don't t
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5985
·
|
|
Logging with a string via %s
Such a "sharp tool" should at least not look exactly like the slow but safe version used absolutely everywhere else. http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taouu/html/ch01s03.html#rule-surprise On the same
Such a "sharp tool" should at least not look exactly like the slow but safe version used absolutely everywhere else. http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taouu/html/ch01s03.html#rule-surprise On the same
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5981
·
|
|
[Zephyr-tsc] Github CODEOWNERS auto-assignment doesn't work as expected
Good guess. Anas found the bug (commas) and fixed it at https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/af3f81ef04bccd0b959 Curious how Anas debugged this because I just found this user who put a
Good guess. Anas found the bug (commas) and fixed it at https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/af3f81ef04bccd0b959 Curious how Anas debugged this because I just found this user who put a
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5950
·
|
|
[Zephyr-tsc] Github CODEOWNERS auto-assignment doesn't work as expected
Hi, While github's features should really work as expected to save confusion and everyone's time, I hope this "under-review" risk is very small because I would expect every reviewer to... review the l
Hi, While github's features should really work as expected to save confusion and everyone's time, I hope this "under-review" risk is very small because I would expect every reviewer to... review the l
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5942
·
|
|
[Zephyr-tsc] Github CODEOWNERS auto-assignment doesn't work as expected
[duplicate message cause the web interface doesn't seem to support cross-posting] I don't know about the github side, however I just found and fixed a number of issues in the Zephyr script that checks
[duplicate message cause the web interface doesn't seem to support cross-posting] I don't know about the github side, however I just found and fixed a number of issues in the Zephyr script that checks
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5941
·
|
|
How to disable optimization in sanitycheck
You may need one extra level of quotation, see --extra-args CMAKE_C_FLAGS example and sanitycheck pointer in https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/14593/files "test/determinism.sh" http://
You may need one extra level of quotation, see --extra-args CMAKE_C_FLAGS example and sanitycheck pointer in https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/14593/files "test/determinism.sh" http://
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5813
·
|
|
Does sanitycheck "--subtest" work and if yes how?
In this example, passing either 1, --test, or 2. --subtest, or 3. both seems to make no difference; in all 3 cases the same, complete kernel.fifo.poll set gets run: ./scripts/sanitycheck -v -v \ --tes
In this example, passing either 1, --test, or 2. --subtest, or 3. both seems to make no difference; in all 3 cases the same, complete kernel.fifo.poll set gets run: ./scripts/sanitycheck -v -v \ --tes
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5762
·
|
|
Seeing and running what CI does (was: CODEOWNERS check in CI)
As I wrote above "make htmldocs" works for me, this PR is actually an htmldocs demo. It would point at the difference(s) between my environment and CI = the vast majority of CI failures when testing l
As I wrote above "make htmldocs" works for me, this PR is actually an htmldocs demo. It would point at the difference(s) between my environment and CI = the vast majority of CI failures when testing l
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5749
·
|
|
CMake comments to HTML? (PR #9947 CMake build architecture documentation)
There's an actual (and draft) PR now in case anyone else is interested in following this: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/13805 Still just a demo. Off the list now. From: <devel@list
There's an actual (and draft) PR now in case anyone else is interested in following this: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/13805 Still just a demo. Off the list now. From: <devel@list
|
By
Marc Herbert
· #5742
·
|