|
Zephyr 1.14.1 tagged
Hi Marc, That's awesome and useful, thanks! - Pushpal
Hi Marc, That's awesome and useful, thanks! - Pushpal
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #6369
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.14.1 tagged
Hi Anas, This is great, thank you. I had a question on the documentation - I can't seem to find the 1.14.1 docs. I see https://docs.zephyrproject.org/1.14.0/, just no 1.14.1. Is the 1.14.0 documentati
Hi Anas, This is great, thank you. I had a question on the documentation - I can't seem to find the 1.14.1 docs. I see https://docs.zephyrproject.org/1.14.0/, just no 1.14.1. Is the 1.14.0 documentati
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #6367
·
|
|
Question about "Zephyr Modules"
Hi, Gotcha. I just saw the "hal_st" and "hal_qmsi" repo's so that's good. - Pushpal <snip>
Hi, Gotcha. I just saw the "hal_st" and "hal_qmsi" repo's so that's good. - Pushpal <snip>
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #5960
·
|
|
Question about "Zephyr Modules"
Hi Anas, Thank you for your response. I figured that we're moving towards these modules. I just wanted to verify that west is becoming an integral tool for working with Zephyr. It sounds very similar
Hi Anas, Thank you for your response. I figured that we're moving towards these modules. I just wanted to verify that west is becoming an integral tool for working with Zephyr. It sounds very similar
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #5958
·
|
|
Question about "Zephyr Modules"
Hi All, This commit caught my eye: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/16039 Does this mean that, if we use the qmsi hal going forward, we *must* use west (I wonder why it wasn't called
Hi All, This commit caught my eye: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/16039 Does this mean that, if we use the qmsi hal going forward, we *must* use west (I wonder why it wasn't called
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #5956
·
|
|
Multiple Instances of Drivers
Tomasz, Thanks for pointing me to that. Pretty much exactly what I was looking / hoping for. - Pushpal <tomasz.bursztyka@...> wrote:
Tomasz, Thanks for pointing me to that. Pretty much exactly what I was looking / hoping for. - Pushpal <tomasz.bursztyka@...> wrote:
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #2223
·
|
|
Multiple Instances of Drivers
I have a question about the current plan to allow multiple instances of a driver. For example, say we have two sx1509b devices as opposed to the currently supported single instance: &i2c0 { status = "
I have a question about the current plan to allow multiple instances of a driver. For example, say we have two sx1509b devices as opposed to the currently supported single instance: &i2c0 { status = "
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #2218
·
|
|
ASSERT failure in USB HID
Resending my last message since zephyr-devel@... doesn't exist anymore, but it's now devel@.... I'll repeat my last message here: Just wanted to add that adding
Resending my last message since zephyr-devel@... doesn't exist anymore, but it's now devel@.... I'll repeat my last message here: Just wanted to add that adding
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #2033
·
|
|
Zephyr list configuration
Classic case of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Further, the list email changed so my mail filters all had to be updated which was a slight annoyance, especially since it was a very sudden change.
Classic case of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Further, the list email changed so my mail filters all had to be updated which was a slight annoyance, especially since it was a very sudden change.
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #2029
·
|
|
STM32L4+ Series Support
Erwan, Sounds good. Thanks. - Pushpal <erwan.gouriou@...> wrote:
Erwan, Sounds good. Thanks. - Pushpal <erwan.gouriou@...> wrote:
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #1369
·
|
|
STM32L4+ Series Support
Hi, I'm considering adding support for the NUCLEO-L4R5ZI or NUCLEO-L476RG boards, but they use the 'newer' STM32L4+ series processors. I was wondering whether or not it constitutes a new soc/st_stm32/
Hi, I'm considering adding support for the NUCLEO-L4R5ZI or NUCLEO-L476RG boards, but they use the 'newer' STM32L4+ series processors. I was wondering whether or not it constitutes a new soc/st_stm32/
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #1353
·
|
|
IDE / Debugging
Thanks for the suggestions / information. I'll begin evaluating these. This may be a great interim solution until the switch to CMake is made and fully tested out. - Pushpal <giannis.damigos@...
Thanks for the suggestions / information. I'll begin evaluating these. This may be a great interim solution until the switch to CMake is made and fully tested out. - Pushpal <giannis.damigos@...
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #1148
·
|
|
IDE / Debugging
Thanks for the suggestion Justin. Haha, by old school, I meant they are very far removed from CLI debugging through gdb (which is what I'm used to) as they've been using tools like IAR for a while. So
Thanks for the suggestion Justin. Haha, by old school, I meant they are very far removed from CLI debugging through gdb (which is what I'm used to) as they've been using tools like IAR for a while. So
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #1136
·
|
|
IDE / Debugging
Hi All, I'm trying to convince my company to switch to Zephyr, but the lack of an actual IDE with a nice graphical debugger startles them (these are old-school type firmware people who have gotten use
Hi All, I'm trying to convince my company to switch to Zephyr, but the lack of an actual IDE with a nice graphical debugger startles them (these are old-school type firmware people who have gotten use
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #1134
·
|
|
stm32f4_disco issues
Hello Erwan, Thanks for the help; the CONFIG_GPIO_STM32_PORTD was missing. I'll send a PR to add this to stm32f4_disco_defconfig later today. Regarding debugging, I was using debug before, but was run
Hello Erwan, Thanks for the help; the CONFIG_GPIO_STM32_PORTD was missing. I'll send a PR to add this to stm32f4_disco_defconfig later today. Regarding debugging, I was using debug before, but was run
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #1106
·
|
|
stm32f4_disco issues
Hi All, I'm attempting to flash the samples/basic/blinky/ project on the stm32f4_disco board, but am running into issues. Here's a list of steps I run through: make BOARD=stm32f4_disco -C samples/basi
Hi All, I'm attempting to flash the samples/basic/blinky/ project on the stm32f4_disco board, but am running into issues. Here's a list of steps I run through: make BOARD=stm32f4_disco -C samples/basi
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #1096
·
|
|
Zephyr DFU protocol
I'm having trouble finding that discussion. Could you point me to it? I'm curious as to why the primary was thought to re-perform the same functions as the SPL in this case. We don't have to follow th
I'm having trouble finding that discussion. Could you point me to it? I'm curious as to why the primary was thought to re-perform the same functions as the SPL in this case. We don't have to follow th
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #886
·
|
|
Zephyr DFU protocol
Sounds like you want an SPL (which I'm for).
Sounds like you want an SPL (which I'm for).
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
· #884
·
|