Reminder: Zephyr: Testing WG weekly call When: Monday, 14 September 2020, 1:00pm to 2:00pm, (GMT+00:00) UTC Where:Microsoft Teams Meeting An RSVP is requested. Click here to RSVP Organizer:

Hi All, This weekly meeting agenda: 1. Discussion on Quality release Metrics on release v2.4.0. (45

Reminder: Zephyr: Testing WG weekly call When: Monday, 7 September 2020, 1:00pm to 2:00pm, (GMT+00:00) UTC Where:Microsoft Teams Meeting An RSVP is requested. Click here to RSVP Organizer:

Hi All, This weely meeting agenda: 1. Qulaity matrics for v2.4.0 discussion and assignment.(all 45 minutes) 2. Round table discussion. (15 minutes) Regards, Hake

Reminder: Zephyr: Testing WG weekly call When: Monday, 31 August 2020, 1:00pm to 2:00pm, (GMT+00:00) UTC Where:Microsoft Teams Meeting An RSVP is requested. Click here to RSVP Organizer:

Hi All, This weekly meeting agenda: 1. Autopush results repo discussion. (Maksim/Jinru Wang 20 minutes) a) There are some discussion on the mailthread. Need get aligned. 2. QEMU

Hi all, On my side, I run the following command one for each session (testing all targets at same time) sanitycheck --ninja --runtime-artifact-cleanup -x=OPENOCD="/local/mcu/tool/openocd/src/openocd"

I run sanitycheck with ‘-o ~/report/frdm_k64f’ such as the report will be generated to my folder, meanwhile there still be a sanity-out folder. Regards, Hake

Hello To force the discussion from Github. My understanding of the current situation about folder where target.xml will be stored to be taken by script: For each run on the platform(target) will be

Reminder: Zephyr: Testing WG weekly call When: Monday, 24 August 2020, 1:00pm to 2:00pm, (GMT+00:00) UTC Where:Microsoft Teams Meeting An RSVP is requested. Click here to RSVP Organizer:

Hi All, This weekly meeting agenda: 1. Introduction of delivery metrics for release quality(Hake 15 mins) 2. Board result upload PR status, and usage. (Maksim 10 mins) 3. Round

According to this pagehttps://openbenchmarking.org/s/QEMU seems they are used for Linux. Anyway, we can skip this for now. Regards, Hake

As Anas said, the data is not valid and inconsistent for Qemu. I think that Qemu benchmarks say nothing about real performance, because it is just a synthetic test. Maksim From:

Hi Maksim, Any reason on QEMU results are not qualified? Just wonder whether it is a license issue of something else. Regards, hake

Hello I discussed with Anas idea to publish Qemu benchmarks in the report. He said that Qemu benchmarks are not qualified to be published. That means we will not have KPI Benchmarks results at all in

Ok Regards, Hake

Hello, please start without me, I will be late 15 min. Maksim

Reminder: Zephyr: Testing WG weekly call When: Monday, 17 August 2020, 1:00pm to 2:00pm, (GMT+00:00) UTC Where:Microsoft Teams Meeting An RSVP is requested. Click here to RSVP Organizer:

Hi All, Today’s meeting agenda: 1. Maciej introduction of issue summary scripts. (Maciej 15 minutes). 2. Review of release metrics documents.(All, 30 minutes) a) overview and

Hi Maciej, I very much recommend using PyGitHub to access the GitHub REST API. We use it in many other scripts and it’s very reliable and useful. https://github.com/PyGithub/PyGithub Carles