Tried to run gptp with the following results - rajas-imac:zephyr rdsingh$ west build -b sam_e70_xplained samples/net/gptp --pristinefdfadfadfad Zephyr version: 2.0.99 -- Found PythonInterp:

Jukka, After clicking on Reply, I realized it is sent to you and not to the group. Please accept my apologies. regards, RDS

Hi all, This week we will look at: - V4Z: Update on comments, merge if there is no objections - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/17194 - EEPROM API proposal -

Hi, I have been using sam-e70 with some of the samples, mainly gptp and echo-server. There have been regressions in past with the networking samples as currently we have no automatic testing of these

Hi all, Wondering if SAME70 XPLD board has been tested with Ethernet Networking Samples in the repository. So far, all the examples that I have tried did not work for me. Wondering if I am missing

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/19244 More discussions on this issue here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/19244

Hi all, Optional property 'erase-block-size' is used to describe the minimum size of flash sector on which an erase operation could be applied. It is generated as a device tree generic define

Cool. Thank you :-) ~Jørn

Jørn Villesen Christensen via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org <extjvc=trifork.com@...> writes: I'm trying to get a beta in people's hands in early November. This will be available on

Hi Marti, Thank you too - and for the links :) Hm... I just assumed that if you were including a project you would always a) need all dependencies of that project, and b) be ok with their licenses.

Hi Jørn, Thank you for taking the time to write down your thoughts. Jørn Villesen Christensen via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org <extjvc=trifork.com@...> writes: Doing this

A reminder that the feature merge window to Zephyr will be closing on November 8th (three short weeks away). Please keep this date in mind for any items you may be working on that you wish to be

"barry.solomon via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org" <barry.solomon=dexcom.com@...> writes: Sounds like a fun hack. I wouldn't have thought of doing it like that! I tried to use pyyaml

Hi Carles, Thanks for the link, I experimented with the settings provided and I maybe saw a small increase (~0.2KiB/s) but not major boost. My client test devices have been: - a 4.0 Bluetooth

Hi Stefan, "stefan.hristozov via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org" <stefan.hristozov=aisec.fraunhofer.de@...> writes: If you want to see what 'west build' is doing, just run it in

Hi Stefan, wrote: You need to create a device driver for this chip. By doing that, the network interface is instantiated automatically when the device runs. I recommend that you look how other

Hi all, This week we will look at: - V4Z: Update on the state of the Pull Request, should we merge it? - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/17194 - GPIO: Update on progress -

Hi Nick, What is your client device? i.e. the device sending the image. If it’s a Linux box running mcumgr there might be limitations there, but if it’s a mobile phone then you should

Dear Zephyr community, I very like the zephyr project but I need more documentation in order to get productive with it. 1) Concepts: For me it looks like Zephyr uses some of the Linux concepts.

Hi all, I'm trying to optimise the mcumgr SMP DFU transfer speed over Bluetooth LE. I'm getting speeds up to 5.12KibB/s (with different combinations of devices) but this Punchthrough blog post claims