|
Re: [STM32L4] looks there is no way to flash and debug?
Ok, so openoncd support is indeed not provided for this board.
And it happens it is not present neither in openocd.
Though, it will work by re-using configuration provided for nucleo_l476rg.
Duplicate
Ok, so openoncd support is indeed not provided for this board.
And it happens it is not present neither in openocd.
Though, it will work by re-using configuration provided for nucleo_l476rg.
Duplicate
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#604
·
|
|
Re: [STM32L4] looks there is no way to flash and debug?
After the build sequence
cmake -GNinja -DBOARD=nucleo_l432kc ..
ninja
[1/95] Generating always_rebuild
Building for board nucleo_l432kc
[90/95] Linking C executable zephyr/zephyr_prebuilt.elf
Memory
After the build sequence
cmake -GNinja -DBOARD=nucleo_l432kc ..
ninja
[1/95] Generating always_rebuild
Building for board nucleo_l432kc
[90/95] Linking C executable zephyr/zephyr_prebuilt.elf
Memory
|
By
Carles Perello
·
#603
·
|
|
Re: [STM32L4] looks there is no way to flash and debug?
Hi Carles,
There is no particular limitation on STM32L4 that should prevent you to flash and debug.
Can you provide us more details on your set up to understand what is going on (board,
SW,
Hi Carles,
There is no particular limitation on STM32L4 that should prevent you to flash and debug.
Can you provide us more details on your set up to understand what is going on (board,
SW,
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#602
·
|
|
[STM32L4] looks there is no way to flash and debug?
Hello
I am starting to do a development on STM32L4 nucleo based
boards....but seems that something is misconfigured as I cant do flash
or debug (either make or ninja).
Any pointer to what I can
Hello
I am starting to do a development on STM32L4 nucleo based
boards....but seems that something is misconfigured as I cant do flash
or debug (either make or ninja).
Any pointer to what I can
|
By
Carles Perello
·
#601
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-devel] error while opening file (NFFS)
I'm not able to understand it. Why Zephyr did these type of changes when there is no demo examples for modules like NFFS ?
Please help to solve this issue. In tests/subsys/fs/nffs_fs_api/ there are
I'm not able to understand it. Why Zephyr did these type of changes when there is no demo examples for modules like NFFS ?
Please help to solve this issue. In tests/subsys/fs/nffs_fs_api/ there are
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#599
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-devel] error while opening file (NFFS)
Hi Vikranth,
Zephyr VFS patches got merged yesterday. These changes are not part of v1.11 but got merged yesterday.
Please refer to the changes needed to comply with VFS under
Hi Vikranth,
Zephyr VFS patches got merged yesterday. These changes are not part of v1.11 but got merged yesterday.
Please refer to the changes needed to comply with VFS under
|
By
Pallala, Ramakrishna <ramakrishna.pallala@...>
·
#600
·
|
|
error while opening file (NFFS)
Hello,
I upgrade to Zephyr v.1.11 & getting this error while opening file using NFFS
[general] [ERR] fs_open: fs_open:mount point not found!!
error -2 while opening test.txt
It was working perfectly
Hello,
I upgrade to Zephyr v.1.11 & getting this error while opening file using NFFS
[general] [ERR] fs_open: fs_open:mount point not found!!
error -2 while opening test.txt
It was working perfectly
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#598
·
|
|
about to use FOTA & Lightweight flash storage layer for constrained devices from v1.11.0
Hello,
How to upgrade firmware on #nRF52840_PDK over Bluetooth Link using newly added FOTA feature in v1.11.0 ? Please provide in detail step wise solution if possible.
Where I will find demo example
Hello,
How to upgrade firmware on #nRF52840_PDK over Bluetooth Link using newly added FOTA feature in v1.11.0 ? Please provide in detail step wise solution if possible.
Where I will find demo example
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#597
·
|
|
Re: increasing nRF52 Bluetooth range
Hi Vikrant,
I tried +8dBm settings and I simply see the increased RSSI value on my iPhone scanning for advertisements.
Regards,
Vinayak
Hi Vikrant,
I tried +8dBm settings and I simply see the increased RSSI value on my iPhone scanning for advertisements.
Regards,
Vinayak
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#596
·
|
|
Re: increasing nRF52 Bluetooth range
Hello Vinayak,
I modified it at stack level so that TX power get set to +8 dBM.
For that, I edited
/home/vikrant/projects/zephyr/zephyr/subsys/bluetooth/controller/ll_sw/ll_test.c:189:
Hello Vinayak,
I modified it at stack level so that TX power get set to +8 dBM.
For that, I edited
/home/vikrant/projects/zephyr/zephyr/subsys/bluetooth/controller/ll_sw/ll_test.c:189:
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#595
·
|
|
Re: increasing nRF52 Bluetooth range
Hi Vikrant,
As I said before:
«Feel free to supply the correct h/w Tx Power enumeration to callers of
Hi Vikrant,
As I said before:
«Feel free to supply the correct h/w Tx Power enumeration to callers of
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#594
·
|
|
Re: increasing nRF52 Bluetooth range
Hello Vinayak,
NRF_RADIO->TXPOWER = 0x8; //+8dBm
err = bt_enable(bt_ready);
if (err) {
printk("Bluetooth init failed (err %d)\n", err);
return;
}
Hello Vinayak,
NRF_RADIO->TXPOWER = 0x8; //+8dBm
err = bt_enable(bt_ready);
if (err) {
printk("Bluetooth init failed (err %d)\n", err);
return;
}
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#593
·
|
|
Re: increasing nRF52 Bluetooth range
Hi Vikrant,
The Zephyr BLE controller does not implement the Tx power set interface in the upstream code, hence Zephyr controller operates with +0dBm transmit power.
Feel free to supply the
Hi Vikrant,
The Zephyr BLE controller does not implement the Tx power set interface in the upstream code, hence Zephyr controller operates with +0dBm transmit power.
Feel free to supply the
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#592
·
|
|
increasing nRF52 Bluetooth range
Hello,
Recently while doing demo test in my office, I found that
range of silicon labs SoC with max. +10dbm power = 2 * range of nRF52 with max. +8 dbm power
Silicon labs demo kit was executing own
Hello,
Recently while doing demo test in my office, I found that
range of silicon labs SoC with max. +10dbm power = 2 * range of nRF52 with max. +8 dbm power
Silicon labs demo kit was executing own
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#591
·
|
|
Re: Securing BLE device communication without OOB pairing (multiple devices)
Awesome, thanks!
>>If he/she clicks on "yes" then only process go ahead.
>>[ Here APP will only connect to Devices which are in vicinity by >>checking their signal strength (RSSI) ]
>>So I think,
Awesome, thanks!
>>If he/she clicks on "yes" then only process go ahead.
>>[ Here APP will only connect to Devices which are in vicinity by >>checking their signal strength (RSSI) ]
>>So I think,
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#590
·
|
|
Re: Securing BLE device communication without OOB pairing (multiple devices)
Hi Vikrant,
Zephyr's Bluetooth stack exposes ECC as standard HCI commands & events
through subsys/bluetooth/host/hci_ecc.c. And you're right that it's the
FIPS P-256 curve that both LE Secure
Hi Vikrant,
Zephyr's Bluetooth stack exposes ECC as standard HCI commands & events
through subsys/bluetooth/host/hci_ecc.c. And you're right that it's the
FIPS P-256 curve that both LE Secure
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#589
·
|
|
Re: Securing BLE device communication without OOB pairing (multiple devices)
Hi Johan,
https://github.com/kmackay/micro-ecc has support for 5 standard curves: secp160r1, secp192r1, secp224r1, secp256r1, and secp256k1.
Out of secp256r1 and secp256k1, which one is used by Zephyr
Hi Johan,
https://github.com/kmackay/micro-ecc has support for 5 standard curves: secp160r1, secp192r1, secp224r1, secp256r1, and secp256k1.
Out of secp256r1 and secp256k1, which one is used by Zephyr
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#588
·
|
|
Re: Securing BLE device communication without OOB pairing (multiple devices)
Hi Johan,
Thanks for reply !!
Ok, but I don't know how to integrate & use it in my current project since there is no any documentation available about it.
So I chose alternate way but will figure out
Hi Johan,
Thanks for reply !!
Ok, but I don't know how to integrate & use it in my current project since there is no any documentation available about it.
So I chose alternate way but will figure out
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#587
·
|
|
Re: Securing BLE device communication without OOB pairing (multiple devices)
Hi Vikrant,
micro-ecc is what the Zephyr TinyCrypt uses, and it is also what the
Zephyr Bluetooth Security Manager (LE pairing) and mesh implementations
use, so no need to start installing micro-ecc
Hi Vikrant,
micro-ecc is what the Zephyr TinyCrypt uses, and it is also what the
Zephyr Bluetooth Security Manager (LE pairing) and mesh implementations
use, so no need to start installing micro-ecc
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#586
·
|
|
Re: Securing BLE device communication without OOB pairing (multiple devices)
Hello World !!
I found solution as micro-ecc library -> https://github.com/kmackay/micro-ecc
to generate #AdminKey or Master key on both sides without transferring
it on insecure Bluetooth Link.
Thank
Hello World !!
I found solution as micro-ecc library -> https://github.com/kmackay/micro-ecc
to generate #AdminKey or Master key on both sides without transferring
it on insecure Bluetooth Link.
Thank
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#585
·
|