|
Build of samples/hello_world for Arduino 101 fails with SDK v0.9 works with SDK v0.8.2
I was testing out building the v1.6.0 kernel using SDK v0.9 for BOARD=arduino_101 and it failed.
I was able to build it using the SDK v0.8.2, but it failed to flash via openOCD.
I´m using Ubuntu
I was testing out building the v1.6.0 kernel using SDK v0.9 for BOARD=arduino_101 and it failed.
I was able to build it using the SDK v0.8.2, but it failed to flash via openOCD.
I´m using Ubuntu
|
By
Alex Molina
·
#13
·
|
|
Re: Intel Pattern Matching in Zephyr?
Hi Vinay, thanks for the very useful information, I'll take a look on the supplied link :)
A question to you, did you use the intel QMSI software package as interface between physical registers and
Hi Vinay, thanks for the very useful information, I'll take a look on the supplied link :)
A question to you, did you use the intel QMSI software package as interface between physical registers and
|
By
Felipe Neves
·
#12
·
|
|
Re: Intel Pattern Matching in Zephyr?
Hello guys,
I have some experience with the PME and have documented some of the examples.
https://github.com/vraoresearch/Intel-Pattern-Matching-Technology
While the Arduino library has all the
Hello guys,
I have some experience with the PME and have documented some of the examples.
https://github.com/vraoresearch/Intel-Pattern-Matching-Technology
While the Arduino library has all the
|
By
Vinay R Rao <vinay.rao@...>
·
#11
·
|
|
Re: Issue when debugging STM32 board with zephyr openocd
Hi Felipe,
Thanks for this answer.
I did not build with specific optimization flag, I did not enable symbol generation neither.
Steps to reproduce are as follows:
$make BOARD=nucleo_f4... debug
>>b
Hi Felipe,
Thanks for this answer.
I did not build with specific optimization flag, I did not enable symbol generation neither.
Steps to reproduce are as follows:
$make BOARD=nucleo_f4... debug
>>b
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#10
·
|
|
Re: Issue when debugging STM32 board with zephyr openocd
Hi Erwan,
Did you build the zephyr project with some optimization flags? such -Os?
Also, in menu config during kernel configuration phase, have you enabled the debug symbol generation?
Also, you need
Hi Erwan,
Did you build the zephyr project with some optimization flags? such -Os?
Also, in menu config during kernel configuration phase, have you enabled the debug symbol generation?
Also, you need
|
By
Felipe Neves
·
#9
·
|
|
Issue when debugging STM32 board with zephyr openocd
Hi,
I've faced an issue when trying to debug using zephyr openocd ("make BOARD=... debug").
Problem happens in step by step debug where I suddenly jump in an unrelated function.
I don't face such
Hi,
I've faced an issue when trying to debug using zephyr openocd ("make BOARD=... debug").
Problem happens in step by step debug where I suddenly jump in an unrelated function.
I don't face such
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#8
·
|
|
Re: Intel Pattern Matching in Zephyr?
Hey guys.
If this library is available to Arduino 101 and TinyTile (as shown in github), and all code base for it is referenced on Intel QMSI library, I think the PME engine is already supportend on
Hey guys.
If this library is available to Arduino 101 and TinyTile (as shown in github), and all code base for it is referenced on Intel QMSI library, I think the PME engine is already supportend on
|
By
Felipe Neves
·
#7
·
|
|
Re: Intel Pattern Matching in Zephyr?
Hi,
I have been trying to use it a bit. The open source code is here.
https://github.com/01org/Intel-Pattern-Matching-Technology
It is bit out of date but with a little bit tweaking you
Hi,
I have been trying to use it a bit. The open source code is here.
https://github.com/01org/Intel-Pattern-Matching-Technology
It is bit out of date but with a little bit tweaking you
|
By
Poussa, Sakari
·
#6
·
|
|
Intel Pattern Matching in Zephyr?
Hi
Just wondering if anybody used the PM technology with zephyr.
There is code for the arduino IDE but I don't know how difficult would be to port it
regards
Hi
Just wondering if anybody used the PM technology with zephyr.
There is code for the arduino IDE but I don't know how difficult would be to port it
regards
|
By
Carles Perello
·
#5
·
|
|
Re: Writing to UART_B of D2000 with Zephyr
Hi Felipe,
I am doing good. How are you?
Thank you very much for your help!
Did you check the pointer received to you dev_b variable after a call of device binding? is it null?
I’ve
Hi Felipe,
I am doing good. How are you?
Thank you very much for your help!
Did you check the pointer received to you dev_b variable after a call of device binding? is it null?
I’ve
|
By
MIKHALEV, Vasily <vasily.mikhalev@...>
·
#4
·
|
|
Re: Writing to UART_B of D2000 with Zephyr
Hi Vasily! How are you doing?
some points that can help you:
- Did you check the pointer received to you dev_b variable after a call of device binding? is it null?
- Check the platform pin-mux to see
Hi Vasily! How are you doing?
some points that can help you:
- Did you check the pointer received to you dev_b variable after a call of device binding? is it null?
- Check the platform pin-mux to see
|
By
Felipe Neves
·
#3
·
|
|
Writing to UART_B of D2000 with Zephyr
Dear community,
I am developing for D2000 with Zephyr and I currently need to be able to write to the UART B and to monitor it. However, I cannot manage to do it.
For writing to the UAR I am
Dear community,
I am developing for D2000 with Zephyr and I currently need to be able to write to the UART B and to monitor it. However, I cannot manage to do it.
For writing to the UAR I am
|
By
MIKHALEV, Vasily <vasily.mikhalev@...>
·
#2
·
|
|
Re: [devel] Zephyr SDK 0.9 released
Hello,
"Nashif, Anas" <anas.nashif@...> wrote:
Based on md5sum, that's the same file as had been announced a week
before. So, people who downloaded it may check their md5 and save
Hello,
"Nashif, Anas" <anas.nashif@...> wrote:
Based on md5sum, that's the same file as had been announced a week
before. So, people who downloaded it may check their md5 and save
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#1
·
|