Hi, Does anyone know if it’s possible to access the ADC on the Adafruit Feather nRF52832 board? I want to access pin 31 to read the battery level. Regards, Tom

Tried many times. No change, still don’t have sam_e70b_xplained. I even tried from scratch, ran West init ~/zephyr Cd ~/zephyr West update

Have you tried ‘west update’? Stephanos

Hi Gerson, My apology, I’m new to these. I deleted the zephyr folder, re-clone from the master. Went to zephyr, type git fetch upstream and got --------- fatal: 'upstream' does not

Hi @ Sam Wong, I made a build test and it is working for me. git checkout master git fetch upstream git rebase upstream/master west update west build -b sam_e70b_xplained samples/net/telnet west build

Hi Anas, Less scientifically I just did some reviews and perhaps half of them already had one approval. So presumably they were blocked. I guess you are saying it's only a third. OK. But that's a lot.

I bought a new SAME70 Xplained board last week and pulled down the latest from Master. Sample projects work as long as networking is not involved. Network projects compiled and run but debugging

I would like to advertise and scan ONLY on one bluetooth channel (for example channel 37). Is there any way to do this in Zephyr? I tried to search parametr responsibles for it in this

Hi everyone! I'm trying to setup the communication between a native_posix board and a sensor. The sensor is connected to my router, and the native_posix program is running on

I would like to advertise and scan ONLY on one bluetooth channel (for example channel 37). Is there any way to do this in Zephyr? I tried to search parametr responsibles for it in this

Hi, Is it possible in Zephyr to advertise and scan through Bluetooth only on single channel ( for example channel37)? I found some file III_chan with channel selection algorithms and I wonder: do i

Any plan to have 1.14 LTS branch upgrading SDK as master does? IMHO, we should do that because we claim it's LTS branch. Thanks

Hi, Here some data… What I have just posted on slack… So, go do some reviews please😊 Thanks Anas From:<devel@...> on behalf of Carles Cufi <carles.cufi@...> Date:

Hi Simon, Not to my knowledge, no. But perhaps Ioannis or Anas know if it’s also documented elsewhere. Regarding the “stamp of approval” that was mentioned earlier in the thread, I think we

Hi Carles, OK I see. Since you called out the 2-approver change as a cause of the bottleneck, I'm assuming there is data available on this. I was looking around for discussion about the decision. The

Agreed. Those who can merge, should take 2 approvals and all other checks as a sign that it is ready to merge, no need for the approval of the person who merges, although a 3rd approval might give the

Hi Charles: This just my personal opinion on the subject. Two approvals is the right thing to do and what the TSC approved earlier this year. BUT, if the second +1 is just a rubber stamp

Hi Simon, A decision like that would need to go through the TSC, and in order to be able to vote we’d need to have clear stats on how many PRs are actually blocked by this policy. I was thinking

Hi Carles, Perhaps given the situation this should be reversed? Regards, Simon

In a x86_64 ubuntu 18.04 I have made this test : /scripts/sanitycheck --all --enable-slow and it work . I have made those test and I get the result and is fine. sanitycheck --coverage -p