Re: Removing an item from the Device tree
Excellent solution. Thank you.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Lawrence King Principal Developer +1(416)627-7302
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 9:52 AM To: Lawrence King <lawrence.king@irdeto.com> Cc: Zephyr-users@lists.zephyrproject.org Subject: Re: [Zephyr-users] Removing an item from the Device tree You can use /delete-property/, something like: &uart0 { /delete-property/ rts-pin; /delete-property/ cts-pin; }; In your overlay should work. - k On Jan 15, 2020, at 8:49 AM, Lawrence King <lawrence.king@irdeto.com> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Re: Removing an item from the Device tree
Kumar Gala
You can use /delete-property/, something like:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
&uart0 { /delete-property/ rts-pin; /delete-property/ cts-pin; }; In your overlay should work. - k
On Jan 15, 2020, at 8:49 AM, Lawrence King <lawrence.king@irdeto.com> wrote:
|
||
|
||
Removing an item from the Device tree
I have a little problem with the device tree
In zephyrproject/zephyr/boards/arm/nrf52840_mdk/nrf52840_mdk.dts the uart is defined as:
&uart0 { compatible = "nordic,nrf-uart"; current-speed = <115200>; status = "okay"; tx-pin = <20>; rx-pin = <19>; rts-pin = <5>; cts-pin = <7>; };
Which works just fine. However I am not using the RTS and CTS pin features of the UART, and I need to use the pins for other things. I can simply go into the DTS file and comment out the two pins:
&uart0 { compatible = "nordic,nrf-uart"; current-speed = <115200>; status = "okay"; tx-pin = <20>; rx-pin = <19>; /* rts-pin = <5>; */ /* cts-pin = <7>; */ };
And all is good. However I would prefer to use an overlay in my local working directory instead of making changes to the zephyr tree. I did try redefining uart0 in the local overlay, but RTS and CTS are still there.
What is the right way to remove RTS and CTS?
Lawrence King Principal Developer Connected Transport Market Unit +1(416)627-7302
CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It can contain proprietary confidential information and be subject to legal privilege and/or subject to a non-disclosure Agreement. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you are not the/an addressee and are in possession of this e-mail, please delete the message and notify us immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you.
|
||
|
||
Re: NVS on flash with erase page size 64k or larger
#nvs
Puzdrowski, Andrzej <Andrzej.Puzdrowski@...>
NVS on flash with erase page size 64k or larger #nvs
Hi.
64k sector is known limitation – it is not planed by us to support more right now. Although a patch witch configurable extension will be accepted. (a I know the code, it shouldn’t be hard to add such extension). AndrzejR
|
||
|
||
Re: Feedback requested on west manifest imports
Jørn Villesen Christensen <jvc@...>
On 14/01/2020 19:33, Bolivar, Marti wrote:
Hello Zephyr users and developers,Just had a read through your documentation; it looks nice. Have not tested the code, but judging from the documentation, it looks useful. Thank you :-) ~Jørn
|
||
|
||
DTS/Binding Issue migrating from 2.0.0 to 2.1.0
#nrf52832
matt@...
Hello Zephyr Users,
I have inherited a Zephyr project using nRF52832 from another developer and am having an issue migrating from 2.0.0 to 2.1.0. Its probably something simple but I'm fairly new to the devicetree system and can't seem to wrap my head around whats wrong here. In my custom board .dts file I have the following i2c configuration (note that the lis3dh is a zephyr-supported sensor driver and I have custom drivers/bindings for tca6507 and mcp47cvb12): Using OS v2.0.0 this built properly. After upgrading the OS to v2.1.0, I get the following error from `zephyr/scripts/dts/extract_dts_includes.py` on build: Exception: /soc/i2c@40003000/lis3dh@19 defines parent /soc/i2c@40003000 as bus master, but /soc/i2c@40003000 is not configured as bus master in bindingBy changing `compatible = "st,lis2dh", "st,lis3dh";` to `compatible = "st,lis2dh-i2c", "st,lis3dh-i2c";` in the .dts file this gets rid of the error for the lis3dh, but i get a similar error for `mcp47cvb12` and `tca6507`. For completeness, here are my .yaml files for these two bindings: mcp,mcp47cvb12.yaml: ti,tca6507.yaml: Alright so onto direct questions:
Matt
|
||
|
||
Feedback requested on west manifest imports
Bolivar, Marti
Hello Zephyr users and developers,
We've just uploaded a pre-release version of west to PyPI with a new feature: manifest imports. We would like your feedback! For a short README you can follow to try it out, see: https://github.com/mbolivar/my-zephyr-app This new feature lets you import projects from a west.yml file somewhere else (like zephyr/west.yml) into your own "downstream" west.yml file. The import gives you the zephyr repository and all its modules "for free": you do not have to copy/paste projects from zephyr/west.yml into your custom file and manually track changes. You can also add your own repositories or override individual modules if you've got your own forks, etc. See the README for links to more information. Please let us know what you think. We'd like to get feedback before the west 0.7 release, as making big changes after that time will be harder to do. Thanks! Marti
|
||
|
||
API meeting: Agenda
Carles Cufi
Hi all,
This week we will focus on a new RFC and GPIO. - RFC: New counter_get_value() API call - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/21846 - GPIO: Update on progress - Proposal from Peter Bigot: Port remaining users without testing them on hardware (accepted) - Look at the PRs with driver conversion (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/18530) - Check users of GPIO APIs: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/20017 - Tips for converting users can be found here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/20017#issuecomment-549315497 (thanks Peter!) - Any additional outstanding PRs to topic-gpio Additional items in the "Triage" column in the GitHub project may be discussed if time permits. If you want an item included in the meeting, please add it to the GitHub project. https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/wiki/Zephyr-Committee-and-Working-Group-Meetings#zephyr-api-discussion https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/projects/18 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lv-8B5QE2m4FjBcvfqAXFIgQfW5oz6306zJ7GIZIWCk/edit Regards, Carles
|
||
|
||
Re: NXP RT1064 board and JLink Debugging
langrind@...
For what it's worth 8 months later, I was able to use PyOCD and the the built-in debugger on RT1064-EVK board to flash the Zephyr blinky program using MCUXpresso's flash programmer. Thus avoiding (for now) the need to buy a J-link probe. I didn't need to change much of anything.
What I did was use the MCUX option to save the flash command it uses to a file, and then tweaked the file so it's a script I can pass in whatever elf file I want: MCUX_WORKSPACE_LOC=$HOME/Documents/MCUXpresso_11.0.1_2563/workspace MCUX_FLASH_DIR0=/usr/local/mcuxpressoide-11.0.1_2563/ide/plugins/com.nxp.mcuxpresso.tools.bin.linux_11.0.1.201908271452/binaries/Flash MCUX_FLASH_DIR1=$HOME/Documents/MCUXpresso_11.0.1_2563/workspace/.mcuxpressoide_packages_support/MIMXRT1064xxxxA_support/Flash MCUX_IDE_BIN=/usr/local/mcuxpressoide-11.0.1_2563/ide/plugins/com.nxp.mcuxpresso.tools.bin.linux_11.0.1.201908271452/binaries/ $MCUX_IDE_BIN/crt_emu_cm_redlink --flash-load-exec $1 -p MIMXRT1064xxxxA --flash-driver MIMXRT1064.cfx -x $HOME/bin --flash-dir $MCUX_FLASH_DIR0 --flash-dir $MCUX_FLASH_DIR1 (some of that stuff may be unnecessary) I copied MIMXRT1064xxxxA_part.xml and MIMXRT1064xxxxA.xml from an MCUX project directory into ~/bin (hence the -x $HOME/bin in the command above) The script will flash the build/zephyr/zephyr.elf no problem. I didn't have to change any jumpers on the RT1064-EVK other than to set SW7 to boot from internal flash. I didn't have to change anything about how the zephyr sample program is built.
|
||
|
||
Upgrade pyocd requested version to 0.24.0
Erwan Gouriou
Hi Zephyr users, In order to benefit from a wider range of user options [1], I'm proposing in PR 21791 to upgrade requirement for pyocd to version 0.24.0. Change should not have impact for most users, but if you have any comments, don't hesitate to let me know (in PR discussion) Cheers Erwan [1]: Check the full list here: https://github.com/mbedmicro/pyOCD/blob/release/v0.24/docs/options.md
|
||
|
||
Re: DHCPV4 and CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS
Jukka Rissanen
Hi, the DHCPv4 code does not really timeout, there is exponential backoff so the system will try to get the IP address as long as needed. For the socket TLS error, you need to enable also mbedTLS as that is used to implement the actual TLS support. Cheers, Jukka
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 17:15 +0100, Denv E wrote:
|
||
|
||
Marciano
After further testing, I found that if I step through each instruction with the debugger the individual messages send correctly, but not if I let the program run regularly. In neither case does the i2c_transfer(…) function return. What might cause the differences in behavior between slow stepping and running the program? PassiveLogic, Inc. Main 801-394-3344 Mobile 801-800-1184 marciano@... This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential or legally privileged information of PassiveLogic and/or its affiliates, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail in its entirety from your system.
|
||
|
||
Marciano
I am attempting to write a basic I2C program using Zephyr, but I am currently unable to sent a single byte over I2C. The program hangs after the first clock falling & rising edge. I'm using external 1K pullups, and have a BME680 device on the other end. I observe the same behavior on the bus with or without the BME680 device. Am I doing something wrong?
prj.conf CONFIG_NEWLIB_LIBC=y CONFIG_PRINTK=y CONFIG_HAS_SEGGER_RTT=y CONFIG_USE_SEGGER_RTT=y CONFIG_RTT_CONSOLE=y CONFIG_UART_CONSOLE=n # nRF5340 board config CONFIG_TRUSTED_EXECUTION_SECURE=y CONFIG_BT=n CONFIG_TIMESLICING=n CONFIG_DEVICE_POWER_MANAGEMENT=y CONFIG_SYS_POWER_MANAGEMENT=y CONFIG_SYS_POWER_DEEP_SLEEP_STATES=y CONFIG_DEVICE_POWER_MANAGEMENT=y CONFIG_I2C=y CONFIG_I2C_1=y main.c #include #include #include <sys/printk.h> #include <drivers/i2c.h> /* Application main Thread */ int main(void) { struct device *p_i2c = device_get_binding("I2C_1"); u32_t dev_config = I2C_SPEED_SET(I2C_SPEED_STANDARD) | I2C_MODE_MASTER; int res = i2c_configure(p_i2c, dev_config); if (res) { return res; } struct i2c_msg msgs[2]; u8_t data[2][2]; data[0][0] = 0x01; // register address data[0][1] = 0x00; msgs[0].buf = data[0]; msgs[0].len = 2U; msgs[0].flags = I2C_MSG_WRITE | I2C_MSG_STOP; data[1][0] = 0x4; data[1][1] = 0xff; msgs[1].buf = data[1]; msgs[1].len = 2U; msgs[1].flags = I2C_MSG_WRITE | I2C_MSG_STOP; int i = i2c_transfer(p_i2c, &msgs[0], 2, 0x77); if (i) printk("transfer failed"); return 0; }
|
||
|
||
DHCPV4 and CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS
Denv E
Hi, using zephyr-v2.1.0 I have build the mqtt_publisher sample application for the stm32f746g_disco and it works fine. I have build the dhcpv4_client sample application for the stm32f746g_disco and it works fine. When I want to combine both, mqtts and dhcpv4, the dhcpv4 is always timing out. I have tried step by step. Using dhcpv4_client sample: add to prj.conf # Enable Sockets support CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS=y CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS=y Then the application is no longer compiling: zephyr/subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c:1735:45: error: 'struct tls_context' has no member named 'ssl' Does sock_opt_tls is depending on mbedtls? In the guiconfig there is no dependency mentioned between CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS and CONFIG_MBEDTLS. The sockets_tls uses different mbedtls defines. What is the correct solution for this problem? kr, Wim
|
||
|
||
API meeting: agenda
Carles Cufi
Hi all,
This week we will focus on RFCs and GPIO: - RFC: API Change: PWM: add support for inverted PWM signals. We will try to close on this today. - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/21384 - RFC: asynchronous i2c and spi API - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/21538 - RFC: Asynchronous sensor API - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/21515 - GPIO: Update on progress - Look at the PRs with driver conversion (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/18530) - Check users of GPIO APIs: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/20017 - Tips for converting users can be found here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/20017#issuecomment-549315497 (thanks Peter!) - Any additional outstanding PRs to topic-gpio Additional items in the "Triage" column in the GitHub project may be discussed if time permits. If you want an item included in the meeting, please add it to the GitHub project. https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/wiki/Zephyr-Committee-and-Working-Group-Meetings#zephyr-api-discussion https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/projects/18 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lv-8B5QE2m4FjBcvfqAXFIgQfW5oz6306zJ7GIZIWCk/edit Regards, Carles
|
||
|
||
Re: NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use?
#nrf52-pca10040
Chruściński, Krzysztof
Hi Martin,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Nrf52832 has 3 RTC's. RTC0 is used for Bluetooth, RTC1 for system clock and RTC2 is usually available for application. You can use RTC2 with counter driver API (see counter.h). Then you can schedule absolute alarms at tick precision. Regards, Krzysztof
-----Original Message-----
From: users@lists.zephyrproject.org <users@lists.zephyrproject.org> On Behalf Of Martin Kozusky [newsgroups] via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org Sent: Sunday, January 5, 2020 9:59 AM To: users@lists.zephyrproject.org Cc: users@lists.zephyrproject.org Subject: [Zephyr-users] NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use? Hi, I understand that there are some problems because of 32768Hz RTC (I am now using NRF52-DK and want to use NRF52832 in my new HW) as referenced here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/9904 there are some already merged PRs (like https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/16782 ) and some waiting to merge. I want to ask: 1 - what is the best solution to call my function every 1ms (or will it be 1.007ms?), is it ok just to use k_timer? Is "next expiration time" calculated just by adding period to current time (that would make a big time diff after many calls) or does it use k_uptime_get*number of expirations to calculate next expiration time? 2 - what is the best solution for most precise long-term time keeping? Let's say i don't want more that 1 minute diff in 20 days. Can I just use k_uptime_get? I would like to make my HW design without aditional external RTC, which can be almost as expensive as another NRF52832 - is it even possible somehow? Or do you have any tip for some cheap low-power RTC? 3 - would using external 16MHz/32MHz (or another frequency) oscilator solve anything? 4 - as someone already wrote here: https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/users/topic/28021125 would it be possible to use timer peripheral (with external osc.) to generate better timing (as I would normaly do on bare-metal)? Thanks.
|
||
|
||
Re: NRF 802.15.4 driver without networking?
Lubos, Robert
Hi Axel,
I've found the following configuration to be the minimal needed to use the Zephyr ieee802154 radio driver w/o the networking stack: CONFIG_IEEE802154=y CONFIG_NETWORKING=y CONFIG_IEEE802154_RAW_MODE=y
I've tested it with nrf52840_pca10056, this configuration builds: * nRF 802.15.4 radio driver (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/hal_nordic/tree/master/drivers/nrf_radio_802154), * Zephyr's shim layer for nRF5 radio driver, implementing Zephyr's ieee802154 radio API (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/master/drivers/ieee802154/ieee802154_nrf5.c), * net_pkt/net_buf support from the networking stack (these are unavoidable as Zephyr's ieee802154 radio API depends on it)
Note, that when using `CONFIG_IEEE802154_RAW_MODE`, it's expected to implement the following function to collect the packets received: int net_recv_data(struct net_if *iface, struct net_pkt *pkt)
This configuration is used in samples like `wpanusb` or `wpan_serial`, you can check more about it here: https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/reference/kconfig/CONFIG_IEEE802154_RAW_MODE.html
If your intention is to use the nRF 802.15.4 radio driver directly and omit the Zephyr shim layer, I'm afraid that's not something we support right now. It should be doable of course, but it would require some custom CMake/Kconfig files, it's not something that could be achieved with the existing configuration. I'd recommend though to stick to the Zephyr API, and to propose improvements, if it does not fit your needs for any reason.
Regards, Robert
From: users@... [mailto:users@...]
On Behalf Of Axel Schlueter via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 01:40 To: users@... Cc: users@... Subject: [Zephyr-users] NRF 802.15.4 driver without networking?
Hi,
|
||
|
||
Re: #i2c How to configure Atmel samd21 to use sercom3
#i2c
Robin Callender <robin@...>
I forgot to include the overlay file…here it is.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
|
||
|
||
#i2c How to configure Atmel samd21 to use sercom3
#i2c
Robin Callender <robin@...>
We are trying to understand how to configure sercom3 to allow I2C support.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The I2C device is the adafruit_oled_featherwing. I believe I have the I2C, SSD1306, framebuffer (cfg), and display. Below is the relevant portions of the prj.conf file Our app builds with these setting, but doesn't seem to conduct I2C traffic. We going though the SAMD21 datasheet, but it is very confusing. We don't understand how the pinmux is being driven to set the pad to I2C mode. Are there any examples showing how to configure I2C for the adafruit_feather_m0_basic board or any other samd21 type board?
CONFIG_HEAP_MEM_POOL_SIZE=4096
|
||
|
||
Re: NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use?
#nrf52-pca10040
Martin Kozusky
Dne 06.01.2020 v 18:31 Andy Ross napsal(a):
On 1/5/20 4:30 AM, Martin Kozusky [newsgroups] wrote:is it 1000ms timeout = 33 cycles, or 1ms timeout = 33 cycles? This is acceptable for short-term timeouts.1 - what is the best solution to call my function every 1ms (or willPeriodic k_timer's do not work in fractional ticks, no. If you When this gets into 2.2, can I use "k_uptime_ticks() / 32768" to get the exact time in seconds?2 - what is the best solution for most precise long-term timeLong term time is kept as a 64 bit count of ticks, so it's not subject As far as using a different oscillator to drive the timer, that'sOn another project, I would like to be sleeping most of the time to save power and want to be woken by pin interrupt or 1 sec timeout, so it is good idea to have clock in low-power. BTW: When I enter to sleep by k_sleep(), is there any change in power consumption besides thread being put to sleep? Or do I have to call device_set_power_state(DEVICE_PM_LOW_POWER_STATE) to enter low-power mode? Will I be automaticaly put to DEVICE_PM_ACTIVE_STATE when there is an pin interrupt and is there any way how to get number of ticks I've been in low-power mode since I was woken by pin interrupt? (are ticks also incremented in low-power mode?) (on bare-metal I would set RTC modulo to wake after 1 second, go to low-power and if I got woken earlier by pin interrupt, I would read RTC counter to get the exact time I was sleeping or if I got woken by RTC INT, I would know it was exactly 1 sec, then do some stuff, again setup RTC, go to sleep ... is this even possible with Zephyr and NRF52832? ) AndyThanks, Martin
|
||
|