Upgrade pyocd requested version to 0.24.0
Erwan Gouriou
Hi Zephyr users, In order to benefit from a wider range of user options [1], I'm proposing in PR 21791 to upgrade requirement for pyocd to version 0.24.0. Change should not have impact for most users, but if you have any comments, don't hesitate to let me know (in PR discussion) Cheers Erwan [1]: Check the full list here: https://github.com/mbedmicro/pyOCD/blob/release/v0.24/docs/options.md
|
|
Re: DHCPV4 and CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS
Jukka Rissanen
Hi, the DHCPv4 code does not really timeout, there is exponential backoff so the system will try to get the IP address as long as needed. For the socket TLS error, you need to enable also mbedTLS as that is used to implement the actual TLS support. Cheers, Jukka
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 17:15 +0100, Denv E wrote:
|
|
Marciano
After further testing, I found that if I step through each instruction with the debugger the individual messages send correctly, but not if I let the program run regularly. In neither case does the i2c_transfer(…) function return. What might cause the differences in behavior between slow stepping and running the program? PassiveLogic, Inc. Main 801-394-3344 Mobile 801-800-1184 marciano@... This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential or legally privileged information of PassiveLogic and/or its affiliates, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail in its entirety from your system.
|
|
Marciano
I am attempting to write a basic I2C program using Zephyr, but I am currently unable to sent a single byte over I2C. The program hangs after the first clock falling & rising edge. I'm using external 1K pullups, and have a BME680 device on the other end. I observe the same behavior on the bus with or without the BME680 device. Am I doing something wrong?
prj.conf CONFIG_NEWLIB_LIBC=y CONFIG_PRINTK=y CONFIG_HAS_SEGGER_RTT=y CONFIG_USE_SEGGER_RTT=y CONFIG_RTT_CONSOLE=y CONFIG_UART_CONSOLE=n # nRF5340 board config CONFIG_TRUSTED_EXECUTION_SECURE=y CONFIG_BT=n CONFIG_TIMESLICING=n CONFIG_DEVICE_POWER_MANAGEMENT=y CONFIG_SYS_POWER_MANAGEMENT=y CONFIG_SYS_POWER_DEEP_SLEEP_STATES=y CONFIG_DEVICE_POWER_MANAGEMENT=y CONFIG_I2C=y CONFIG_I2C_1=y main.c #include #include #include <sys/printk.h> #include <drivers/i2c.h> /* Application main Thread */ int main(void) { struct device *p_i2c = device_get_binding("I2C_1"); u32_t dev_config = I2C_SPEED_SET(I2C_SPEED_STANDARD) | I2C_MODE_MASTER; int res = i2c_configure(p_i2c, dev_config); if (res) { return res; } struct i2c_msg msgs[2]; u8_t data[2][2]; data[0][0] = 0x01; // register address data[0][1] = 0x00; msgs[0].buf = data[0]; msgs[0].len = 2U; msgs[0].flags = I2C_MSG_WRITE | I2C_MSG_STOP; data[1][0] = 0x4; data[1][1] = 0xff; msgs[1].buf = data[1]; msgs[1].len = 2U; msgs[1].flags = I2C_MSG_WRITE | I2C_MSG_STOP; int i = i2c_transfer(p_i2c, &msgs[0], 2, 0x77); if (i) printk("transfer failed"); return 0; }
|
|
DHCPV4 and CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS
Denv E
Hi, using zephyr-v2.1.0 I have build the mqtt_publisher sample application for the stm32f746g_disco and it works fine. I have build the dhcpv4_client sample application for the stm32f746g_disco and it works fine. When I want to combine both, mqtts and dhcpv4, the dhcpv4 is always timing out. I have tried step by step. Using dhcpv4_client sample: add to prj.conf # Enable Sockets support CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS=y CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS=y Then the application is no longer compiling: zephyr/subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c:1735:45: error: 'struct tls_context' has no member named 'ssl' Does sock_opt_tls is depending on mbedtls? In the guiconfig there is no dependency mentioned between CONFIG_NET_SOCKETS_SOCKOPT_TLS and CONFIG_MBEDTLS. The sockets_tls uses different mbedtls defines. What is the correct solution for this problem? kr, Wim
|
|
API meeting: agenda
Carles Cufi
Hi all,
This week we will focus on RFCs and GPIO: - RFC: API Change: PWM: add support for inverted PWM signals. We will try to close on this today. - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/21384 - RFC: asynchronous i2c and spi API - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/21538 - RFC: Asynchronous sensor API - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/21515 - GPIO: Update on progress - Look at the PRs with driver conversion (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/18530) - Check users of GPIO APIs: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/20017 - Tips for converting users can be found here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/20017#issuecomment-549315497 (thanks Peter!) - Any additional outstanding PRs to topic-gpio Additional items in the "Triage" column in the GitHub project may be discussed if time permits. If you want an item included in the meeting, please add it to the GitHub project. https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/wiki/Zephyr-Committee-and-Working-Group-Meetings#zephyr-api-discussion https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/projects/18 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lv-8B5QE2m4FjBcvfqAXFIgQfW5oz6306zJ7GIZIWCk/edit Regards, Carles
|
|
Re: NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use?
#nrf52-pca10040
Chruściński, Krzysztof
Hi Martin,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Nrf52832 has 3 RTC's. RTC0 is used for Bluetooth, RTC1 for system clock and RTC2 is usually available for application. You can use RTC2 with counter driver API (see counter.h). Then you can schedule absolute alarms at tick precision. Regards, Krzysztof
-----Original Message-----
From: users@lists.zephyrproject.org <users@lists.zephyrproject.org> On Behalf Of Martin Kozusky [newsgroups] via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org Sent: Sunday, January 5, 2020 9:59 AM To: users@lists.zephyrproject.org Cc: users@lists.zephyrproject.org Subject: [Zephyr-users] NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use? Hi, I understand that there are some problems because of 32768Hz RTC (I am now using NRF52-DK and want to use NRF52832 in my new HW) as referenced here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/9904 there are some already merged PRs (like https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/16782 ) and some waiting to merge. I want to ask: 1 - what is the best solution to call my function every 1ms (or will it be 1.007ms?), is it ok just to use k_timer? Is "next expiration time" calculated just by adding period to current time (that would make a big time diff after many calls) or does it use k_uptime_get*number of expirations to calculate next expiration time? 2 - what is the best solution for most precise long-term time keeping? Let's say i don't want more that 1 minute diff in 20 days. Can I just use k_uptime_get? I would like to make my HW design without aditional external RTC, which can be almost as expensive as another NRF52832 - is it even possible somehow? Or do you have any tip for some cheap low-power RTC? 3 - would using external 16MHz/32MHz (or another frequency) oscilator solve anything? 4 - as someone already wrote here: https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/users/topic/28021125 would it be possible to use timer peripheral (with external osc.) to generate better timing (as I would normaly do on bare-metal)? Thanks.
|
|
Re: NRF 802.15.4 driver without networking?
Lubos, Robert
Hi Axel,
I've found the following configuration to be the minimal needed to use the Zephyr ieee802154 radio driver w/o the networking stack: CONFIG_IEEE802154=y CONFIG_NETWORKING=y CONFIG_IEEE802154_RAW_MODE=y
I've tested it with nrf52840_pca10056, this configuration builds: * nRF 802.15.4 radio driver (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/hal_nordic/tree/master/drivers/nrf_radio_802154), * Zephyr's shim layer for nRF5 radio driver, implementing Zephyr's ieee802154 radio API (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/master/drivers/ieee802154/ieee802154_nrf5.c), * net_pkt/net_buf support from the networking stack (these are unavoidable as Zephyr's ieee802154 radio API depends on it)
Note, that when using `CONFIG_IEEE802154_RAW_MODE`, it's expected to implement the following function to collect the packets received: int net_recv_data(struct net_if *iface, struct net_pkt *pkt)
This configuration is used in samples like `wpanusb` or `wpan_serial`, you can check more about it here: https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/reference/kconfig/CONFIG_IEEE802154_RAW_MODE.html
If your intention is to use the nRF 802.15.4 radio driver directly and omit the Zephyr shim layer, I'm afraid that's not something we support right now. It should be doable of course, but it would require some custom CMake/Kconfig files, it's not something that could be achieved with the existing configuration. I'd recommend though to stick to the Zephyr API, and to propose improvements, if it does not fit your needs for any reason.
Regards, Robert
From: users@... [mailto:users@...]
On Behalf Of Axel Schlueter via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 01:40 To: users@... Cc: users@... Subject: [Zephyr-users] NRF 802.15.4 driver without networking?
Hi,
|
|
Re: #i2c How to configure Atmel samd21 to use sercom3
#i2c
Robin Callender <robin@...>
I forgot to include the overlay file…here it is.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
|
|
#i2c How to configure Atmel samd21 to use sercom3
#i2c
Robin Callender <robin@...>
We are trying to understand how to configure sercom3 to allow I2C support.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The I2C device is the adafruit_oled_featherwing. I believe I have the I2C, SSD1306, framebuffer (cfg), and display. Below is the relevant portions of the prj.conf file Our app builds with these setting, but doesn't seem to conduct I2C traffic. We going though the SAMD21 datasheet, but it is very confusing. We don't understand how the pinmux is being driven to set the pad to I2C mode. Are there any examples showing how to configure I2C for the adafruit_feather_m0_basic board or any other samd21 type board?
CONFIG_HEAP_MEM_POOL_SIZE=4096
|
|
Re: NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use?
#nrf52-pca10040
Martin Kozusky
Dne 06.01.2020 v 18:31 Andy Ross napsal(a):
On 1/5/20 4:30 AM, Martin Kozusky [newsgroups] wrote:is it 1000ms timeout = 33 cycles, or 1ms timeout = 33 cycles? This is acceptable for short-term timeouts.1 - what is the best solution to call my function every 1ms (or willPeriodic k_timer's do not work in fractional ticks, no. If you When this gets into 2.2, can I use "k_uptime_ticks() / 32768" to get the exact time in seconds?2 - what is the best solution for most precise long-term timeLong term time is kept as a 64 bit count of ticks, so it's not subject As far as using a different oscillator to drive the timer, that'sOn another project, I would like to be sleeping most of the time to save power and want to be woken by pin interrupt or 1 sec timeout, so it is good idea to have clock in low-power. BTW: When I enter to sleep by k_sleep(), is there any change in power consumption besides thread being put to sleep? Or do I have to call device_set_power_state(DEVICE_PM_LOW_POWER_STATE) to enter low-power mode? Will I be automaticaly put to DEVICE_PM_ACTIVE_STATE when there is an pin interrupt and is there any way how to get number of ticks I've been in low-power mode since I was woken by pin interrupt? (are ticks also incremented in low-power mode?) (on bare-metal I would set RTC modulo to wake after 1 second, go to low-power and if I got woken earlier by pin interrupt, I would read RTC counter to get the exact time I was sleeping or if I got woken by RTC INT, I would know it was exactly 1 sec, then do some stuff, again setup RTC, go to sleep ... is this even possible with Zephyr and NRF52832? ) AndyThanks, Martin
|
|
Re: NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use?
#nrf52-pca10040
Andy Ross
On 1/5/20 4:30 AM, Martin Kozusky [newsgroups] wrote:
1 - what is the best solution to call my function every 1ms (or willPeriodic k_timer's do not work in fractional ticks, no. If you schedule a 1000ms timeout it will be rounded up internally to exactly 33 hardware cycles, and that process will repeat each cycle. So you would see the ~993 Hz tick rate you calculated. If you want to work in fractional ticks, the application needs to do that math itself. 2 - what is the best solution for most precise long-term timeLong term time is kept as a 64 bit count of ticks, so it's not subject to the kind of round-off errors that periodic timers are. As long as your app isn't dropping or delaying the counter interrupts, the uptime value should be as accurate as your crystal is. If you want to get 1 callback per second as a long term average, you can (with care) compute your timeout as an offset from system start or some other time reference instead of "now" (i.e. the Nth timeout will happen at "N * 1000ms", plus a little precision slop due to the clock mismatch). There's actually an API change which will make this kind of code significantly easier, see https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/21305 As far as using a different oscillator to drive the timer, that's possible but requires some driver fiddling. I'll let the Nordic folks speak to that. One option might be to use the generic ARM SysTick driver, which doesn't have the rate mismatch issues of the 32kHz timer, but doesn't have the low power idle characteristics. Andy
|
|
NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use?
#nrf52-pca10040
Martin Kozusky
Hi,
I understand that there are some problems because of 32768Hz RTC (I am now using NRF52-DK and want to use NRF52832 in my new HW) as referenced here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/9904 there are some already merged PRs (like https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/16782 ) and some waiting to merge. I want to ask: 1 - what is the best solution to call my function every 1ms (or will it be 1.007ms?), is it ok just to use k_timer? Is "next expiration time" calculated just by adding period to current time (that would make a big time diff after many calls) or does it use k_uptime_get*number of expirations to calculate next expiration time? 2 - what is the best solution for most precise long-term time keeping? Let's say i don't want more that 1 minute diff in 20 days. Can I just use k_uptime_get? I would like to make my HW design without aditional external RTC, which can be almost as expensive as another NRF52832 - is it even possible somehow? Or do you have any tip for some cheap low-power RTC? 3 - would using external 16MHz/32MHz (or another frequency) oscilator solve anything? 4 - as someone already wrote here: https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/users/topic/28021125 would it be possible to use timer peripheral (with external osc.) to generate better timing (as I would normaly do on bare-metal)? Thanks.
|
|
NRF52 and timing - actual state and what functions to use?
#nrf52-pca10040
Martin Kozusky
Hi,
I understand that there are some problems because of 32768Hz RTC with NRF52832 as referenced here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/9904 , there are some already merged PRs (like https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/16782 ) and some waiting to merge, so what is the actual state at 2.1.0? I want to ask: 1 - what is the best solution to call my function every 1ms (or will it be 1.007ms?), is it ok just to use k_timer? Is "next expiration time" calculated just by adding period to current time (that would make a big time diff after many calls) or does it use k_uptime_get*number of expirations to calculate next expiration time? 2 - what is the best solution for most precise long-term time keeping? Let's say i don't want more that 1 minute diff in 20 days. Can I just use k_uptime_get? I would like to make my HW design without aditional external RTC, which can be almost as expensive as another NRF52832 - is it even possible somehow? Or do you have any tip for some cheap low-power RTC? 3 - would using external 16MHz/32MHz (or another frequency) oscilator solve anything? 4 - as someone already wrote here: https://lists.zephyrproject.org/g/users/topic/28021125 would it be possible to use timer peripheral (with external osc.) to generate better timing (as I would normaly do with bare-metal sources)? Thanks.
|
|
@yasokada
Instead of adding k_usleep(30),
I changed the SPI clock from 210kHz to 406kHz for STM32F769. Then, the problems of A and B are gone. Still I have the problem of C. I receive 0x07 instead of 0x01. From what I read throught the internet, the CRC for CMD is 0x95. But in Zephyr, the CRC is 0x94. I wonder whether this difference cause some problem. However, for STM32L476, this works. I will check further on this.
|
|
@yasokada
From what I checked:
- A. 74 clocks stop with a change in CS without sufficient delay - B. CMD0 (0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x94) fails to send 0x40... (instead send 0x20...) - C. CMD0 fails to receive 0x01 I added `k_usleep(30); // usec` before sdhc_spi_set_cs(data, 0); in sdhc_spi_go_idle() of disk_access_spi_sdhc.c. Then, the above A and B are solved. However, I still have the problem of C. This may be caused without sufficient delay after sending 0x94. I am checking how to add delay after 0x94. I also checked the clock frequency. - STM32L476: 312kHz - STM32F768: 210kHz I am not sure whether this difference in the frequency makes the failure and success of the process.
|
|
Re: "in-tree" builds > its meaning
@yasokada
Dear Marti
Thank you very much for your reply. I can understand the difference now. Best regards Yasuhiko Okada
|
|
NRF 802.15.4 driver without networking?
axel+zephyr@...
Hi, I should probably start by saying that I’m brand new to Zephyr and that I’m pretty sure I’m missing something obvious or just overlooked parts of the (great!) documentation. I’m trying to configure my project to use the NRF 802.15.4 radio driver coming with Zephyr (in the modules/hal/nordic/drivers/nrf_radio_802154) without any of the other Zephyr networking support, but I can’t figure out a project config that would help me achieve this. I played with various configs, and the most promising seems to be CONFIG_NETWORKING=n CONFIG_IEEE802154=y CONFIG_IEEE802154_NRF5=y CONFIG_IEEE802154_RAW_MODE=n CONFIG_HAS_NORDIC_DRIVERS=y but Kconfig won’t let me set CONFIG_HAS_NORDIC_DRIVERS manually (which is required to include the drivers subfolder, see modules/hal/nordic/CMakeLists.txt). As a desperate measure I tried to set every CONFIG_IEEE802154_xxx config flag to no and instead include the driver as an extra module via set(ZEPHYR_EXTRA_MODULES [some_directory]/modules/hal/nordic/drivers/nrf_radio_802154) but no luck either. Any ideas what else I could try? Thanks, Axel
|
|
NRF 802.15.4 driver without networking?
Axel Schlueter <axel@...>
Hi,
I should probably start by saying that I’m brand new to Zephyr and that I’m pretty sure I’m missing something obvious or just overlooked parts of the (great!) documentation. I’m trying to configure my project to use the NRF 802.15.4 radio driver coming with Zephyr (in the modules/hal/nordic/drivers/nrf_radio_802154) without any of the other Zephyr networking support, but I can’t figure out a project config that would help me achieve this. I played with various configs, and the most promising seems to be CONFIG_NETWORKING=n CONFIG_IEEE802154=y CONFIG_IEEE802154_NRF5=y CONFIG_IEEE802154_RAW_MODE=n CONFIG_HAS_NORDIC_DRIVERS=y but Kconfig won’t let me set CONFIG_HAS_NORDIC_DRIVERS manually (which is required to include the drivers subfolder, see modules/hal/nordic/CMakeLists.txt). As a desperate measure I tried to set every CONFIG_IEEE802154_xxx config flag to no and instead include the driver as an extra module via set(ZEPHYR_EXTRA_MODULES [some_directory]/modules/hal/nordic/drivers/nrf_radio_802154) but no luck either. Any ideas what else I could try? Thanks, Axel
|
|
Re: cannot find "__device_[device name]"
#api
Bolivar, Marti
Hi Justin,
"Justin Huang via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org" <justin.y.huang=live.com@lists.zephyrproject.org> writes: Hi,DEVICE_GET() might not be the right thing here. Are you trying to get a pointer to your device from the device driver C file itself, or from some other file? If you're trying to get a pointer to your device from some application source code, you should probably be using device_get_binding() instead of DEVICE_GET(). If (and only if) the DEVICE_GET() line is in the same file as the above DEVICE_INIT(), then it should work properly when paired with DEVICE_DECLARE(), as shown with example code in this documentation page: https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/reference/drivers/index.html#single-driver-multiple-instances However, note that DEVICE_INIT allocates a static struct device, so you can't use DEVICE_GET() to access that device from another file. If you're trying to get a pointer to your struct device from another C file, you need to use something like this instead: struct device *mydev = device_get_binding(CONFIG_MYDEV_NAME); BR, Martí
|
|