Hi Vikrant, As I said before: «Feel free to supply the correct h/w Tx Power enumeration to callers of https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/master/subsys/bluetooth/controller/hal/nrf5/radi

Hi Vikrant, I tried +8dBm settings and I simply see the increased RSSI value on my iPhone scanning for advertisements. Regards, Vinayak

Hi Vikrant, If you are using android devices, their connection management will not disconnect an ACL link within a 30 second (my experience, not verified their implementation) window of the connection

Hi Vikrant, If you have a connection active, you cannot start another connectable advertising unless you start supporting more than one active connection. Use non-connectable or scannable advertising

Please follow this, if using hci_uart: https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5x-support-within-the-zephyr-project-rtos Else if using hci_usb and the nRF52840’s native USB p

Hi Matias, Please create a github issue detailing the steps to reproduce, please mention the diff/changes of the upstream master samples you are using. Also upload the “.config” file of your build. Yo

Hi Chris, Only one connectable advertising instance is supported in the zephyr controller. Multiple simultaneous connections are supported, but that is not going to help denial of service if you do no

Hi, Zephyr open source controller does not support long range. The feature is under development by our contributors. The missing supported commands may be a bug, but on quick review I could find them

#ble #hci #usb

Hi, If you are building a Bluetooth Low Energy application using Zephyr, then you should use the public APIs, not call internal subsystem functions unless you know what you are doing. I think you are

> I still do not see any parameter where I can set my own frequency… This is the main part that I have been working on for a while now. Does this mean I DO have to use the ll_sw files? There are no st

> What you’re saying is sending only the bigger second part of the message is against Bluetooth’s specifications? Yes., thats against the specification and inter-operability. > So what you’re suggesti

> Since I’m changing the behaviour of the BLE protocol quite a bit with this, this means that it won’t comply to the Bluetooth specs anyway? Meaning the first advertisement can be omitted if I’d reall

Hi Jason, Without bonding (connect, pair, encrypt and distribute keys) with the device, IRK cannot be obtained from the remove device. Regards, Vinayak